Prompt Library

Operations And Profit

Cost Reduction Opportunity Analyzer

Reviews business expenses to identify 15-25% in unnecessary spending.

1. Expense Data Collection

  1. Ask the user to provide a breakdown of all business expenses by category—software/tools, labor, marketing, office/overhead, professional services, etc.
    • Example: "What are your monthly/annual expenses across all categories? Include software subscriptions, payroll, marketing spend, rent, contractors, and other recurring costs."
  2. Ask the user which expenses feel disproportionately high or provide unclear ROI.
    • Example: "Which expense categories feel too high or where are you unsure if you're getting good value for money?"
  3. Ask the user about contracts and commitments—what's locked in long-term vs. flexible month-to-month.
    • Example: "Which expenses are committed (annual contracts, leases) vs. flexible (monthly subscriptions, variable costs)?"
  4. Ask the user about their business stage and priorities—growth mode, profitability focus, or break-even pressure.
    • Example: "Are you prioritizing growth and can absorb higher costs, or is profitability and cash conservation the current goal?"

2. Expense Audit Framework

Analyze expenses across these dimensions:

Utilization Analysis:

  • Software/tools: Are all subscriptions actively used? How many seats/licenses are idle?
  • Services: Are retained services (legal, accounting, consultants) proportional to actual usage?
  • Space: Is office space fully utilized or could you downsize/go remote?

Redundancy Check:

  • Multiple tools solving the same problem (3 project management tools, 2 CRMs)
  • Overlapping vendor capabilities (could one vendor replace three?)
  • Internal duplication (multiple teams buying same services separately)

Value-for-Money Assessment:

  • Compare pricing against alternatives for same functionality
  • Evaluate if premium tiers are necessary or if lower plans suffice
  • Identify features paid for but never used

Negotiation Opportunities:

  • Long-term vendor relationships where rates haven't been reviewed
  • Volume discounts not being captured
  • Competing quotes not obtained in 12+ months

3. Savings Identification

Categorize cost reduction opportunities:

Quick Wins (Implement this month):

  • Cancel unused subscriptions and idle accounts
  • Downgrade overprovisioned plans (too many seats, features)
  • Remove redundant tools where overlap exists
  • Estimated savings: 10-15% of software/subscription spend

Negotiable (Next 90 days):

  • Renegotiate vendor contracts with competing quotes
  • Switch to annual plans for discounts on frequently used tools
  • Consolidate multiple vendors into single platform deals
  • Estimated savings: 10-20% on negotiable services

Strategic Shifts (Next 6 months):

  • Transition expensive tools to more cost-effective alternatives
  • In-source services currently outsourced (or vice versa if inefficient)
  • Restructure team/contractor mix for better cost efficiency
  • Estimated savings: 15-25% on major expense categories

4. Risk Assessment

For each recommendation, evaluate:

  • Implementation complexity: Easy cancel vs. requires migration/change management
  • Business impact: No disruption vs. affects workflows or customer experience
  • Savings certainty: Guaranteed reduction vs. estimated based on assumptions
  • Reversibility: Easy to undo if doesn't work vs. one-way decision

Prioritize high-savings, low-risk, easy-to-implement opportunities first.

5. Action Plan Delivery

  • Present findings in a prioritized table: Expense Item | Current Cost | Recommended Action | Estimated Savings | Implementation Effort | Risk Level
  • Organize by category: Immediate Actions, 90-Day Negotiations, Strategic Changes
  • Calculate total potential savings across all recommendations
  • Provide implementation roadmap: what to tackle first, dependencies, timing
  • Include vendor-specific negotiation scripts or alternative tool recommendations where relevant
  • Invite feedback on which reductions align with business priorities vs. which might negatively impact operations