Prompt Library

Revenue Generation

Commission Structure Calculator for Sales Teams

Models different commission plans to maximize both motivation and profitability.

1. Business Context Gathering

  1. Ask the user about their sales team size, roles (AE, SDR, closer, account manager), and current compensation structure.
    • Example: "How many people are on your sales team, what are their roles, and how are they currently compensated (base + commission, percentage rates, bonuses)?"
  2. Ask the user to define revenue goals and what behaviors they want to incentivize—new customer acquisition, account expansion, retention, or deal size.
    • Example: "What are your revenue targets, and what sales behaviors matter most—closing new deals, upselling existing accounts, hitting quotas, or deal velocity?"
  3. Ask the user for key metrics: average deal size, sales cycle length, monthly/quarterly quotas, and current team performance against targets.
    • Example: "What's your average deal size, typical sales cycle, and are reps currently hitting 80%, 100%, or 120% of quota on average?"
  4. Ask the user about budget constraints and what percentage of revenue they're willing to allocate to sales compensation.
    • Example: "What's your budget for sales compensation as a percentage of revenue—industry standard is 10-15%, where do you fall?"

2. Calculation Engine

  • Model multiple commission structures: flat percentage, tiered accelerators, quota-based bonuses, team vs. individual splits, spiffs for specific behaviors.
  • Calculate total compensation scenarios for reps performing at 50%, 100%, 150%, and 200% of quota to show motivation curve.
  • Analyze profitability at each performance level: ensure high performers are rewarded but company still maintains healthy margins.
  • Compare commission structures for different outcomes: prioritizing volume (more deals) vs. value (bigger deals) vs. speed (shorter cycles).
  • Factor in behavioral economics: does the structure create clear motivation, diminishing returns, or potential gaming?

3. Scenario Modeling

  • Present 3-4 commission structure options with clear trade-offs: Simple (easy to understand, predictable), Accelerated (motivates overachievement), Team-Based (encourages collaboration), Hybrid (balances multiple priorities).
  • For each structure, show example earnings at different performance levels in a comparison table.
  • Model expected cost to company based on realistic performance distribution (if 30% hit quota, 40% at 80%, 20% at 120%, etc.).
  • Calculate breakeven and profitability thresholds for each structure.
  • Highlight which behaviors each structure incentivizes and potential unintended consequences (sandbagging, cherry-picking accounts).

4. Strategic Validation

  • Verify commission rates are competitive with industry benchmarks for similar roles and company stages.
  • Confirm the structure aligns incentives with company priorities (growth, profitability, customer success).
  • Check for fairness and motivation balance: top performers are well-rewarded, but underperformers aren't punished unfairly.
  • Review for simplicity—can reps easily calculate their expected earnings, or is the structure too complex?

5. Implementation Blueprint

  • Present recommended commission structure with full breakdown: base salary, commission rates, accelerators, caps (if any), payment timing.
  • Provide implementation guidance: how to communicate changes, transition plans if changing existing structure, ramp periods for new hires.
  • Include example commission statements showing how reps calculate their earnings based on deals closed.
  • Offer ongoing optimization recommendations: review quarterly, adjust based on performance distribution, test refinements.
  • Invite user to discuss concerns about motivation, fairness, or budget implications before finalizing.